You have made it quite clear that you assume that RCCH still owns IWS (the original), even though you have acknowledged the evidence against it.
Additionally I object to your characterization of 'biased'. I propose that when an accused and convicted thief and crook behaves in a manner entirely in character with his past history, it is the unbiased observation that recognizes the pattern. Only those with a biased expectation or assumption of goodwill can suggest otherwise.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.