InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,780.05
(
-0.21%
)
US TECH 100
19,731.60
(
0.03%
)
Dow Jones
42,454.12
(
-0.14%
)
Brent Oil
78.91
(
-0.20%
)
Bitcoin
60,565.45
(
0.49%
)
Post# of 30046
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Gold Seeker

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 29
Posts 9421
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/30/2006

Gold Seeker

Re: primarywatcher post# 4248

Wednesday, 04/27/2011 5:56:23 PM

Wednesday, April 27, 2011 5:56:23 PM

Post# of 30046
Primary, the only thing new is tossing out a figure of Onko Sure being 17% better than CEA for detecting progression of stage I and II CRC.

We know that CEA is so bad for stage I and II that the use is not in the indication.

How good or how poor does a test have to be to be 17% better than something that is too poor to use.

Notice again, they did not give the figures for how good CEA was nor how good Onko Sure was. They don't want to to know those numbers.

I have never shorted nor intend to have any financial interest in this stock. I am not connected with anyone who trades, shorts or has financial interests in this stock. I only post facts and my opinions. I do not post on IHUB with different aliases.

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up