![](http://investorshub.advfn.com/images/default_ih_profile2_4848.jpg?cb=0)
Sunday, April 24, 2011 1:34:14 PM
The 3.6 number *could* be an estimate of cost of shipping which was *speculated* earlier as something that consistently occurs in some arenas. That seems to make some sense considering profit margin is figured at 50-60% at market/industry rates right? The 80 number is consistent with other mining companies production costs as well. So if they did get the revenue (7 mil+) that people were projecting it would actually confirm a 50% profit, which is possible by all accounts that longs here have given and what typical industry returns are. It would explain their ability to add more heavy equipment per the PR. Otherwise they wouldn't have any money leftover to pull that particular item off (or potentially get another ship here)unless the cost of production per ton is really low for CWRN, and no one has been suggesting that as far as I can remember, Otherwise I would have seen 70-80% profit margin rants. Thoughts?
Last Shot Hydration Drink Announced as Official Sponsor of Red River Athletic Conference • EQLB • Jun 20, 2024 2:38 PM
ATWEC Announces Major Acquisition and Lays Out Strategic Growth Plans • ATWT • Jun 20, 2024 7:09 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Composite Assays of 0.53 and 0.44 Troy Ounces per Ton Gold in Trenches B + C at Fran Gold, British Columbia • NBRI • Jun 18, 2024 9:18 AM
VAYK Assembling New Management Team for $64 Billion Domestic Market • VAYK • Jun 18, 2024 9:00 AM
Fifty 1 Labs, Inc Announces Acquisition of Drago Knives, LLC • CAFI • Jun 18, 2024 8:45 AM
Hydromer Announces Attainment of ISO 13485 Certification • HYDI • Jun 17, 2024 9:22 AM