InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 611
Posts 26762
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 08/12/2010

Re: bonten1 post# 8115

Friday, 04/22/2011 11:33:45 AM

Friday, April 22, 2011 11:33:45 AM

Post# of 30951
My take on the kit...

is this:

The significance of the comparison is the review process in China has already approved a similar device/product. Proof of concept is no longer an issue here, which can be huge for a totally new concept/device to a target directive. Also if you take a look at China Sky you can see that they are quite established with a market cap in the 53 million range.

I am sure that AB Whuhan's early AMI test will prove either more efficient or more economical than China Sky's product. Either way its a postive.

Just remember we sit at .0023 per share and if we can devise an equal or better mousetrap its a huge win for us. We only need small percentages of market share to make huge impacts to the bottom line.

Now lets consider the possibilities that we have a far far better device and we can take a large amount of market share. Again "GAME OVER" we are on our way to huge breakouts, which happen in this space. Just check VR#L in September of 2009.....

This all said we haven't even touched on the fact we may have a solar play on the way.....

Just food for thought...