InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 13
Posts 1425
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/17/2009

Re: BigBake1 post# 107819

Friday, 04/22/2011 11:11:36 AM

Friday, April 22, 2011 11:11:36 AM

Post# of 111729
Since the "company" has been forced to publicly acknowledge the source of their new "direction" .. it only seems right to share information from that company.


Our patented technology is unproven on a large-scale industrial basis and could fail to perform in an industrial production environment.

The technologies which we are pursuing for MagneGas production from liquid waste have never been utilized on a large-scale industrial basis. All of the tests which we have conducted to date with respect to our technologies have been performed on limited quantities, and we cannot assure you that the same or similar results could be obtained on a large-scale industrial basis. We have never utilized these MagneGas technologies under the conditions or in the volumes that will be required on a large scale and cannot predict all of the difficulties that may arise. In addition, our technology has never operated at a volume level required to be profitable. As our product is an alternative to Acetylene, the unstable price of Acetylene will impact our ability to become profitable and to sell cost competitive fuel. It is possible that the technologies, when used, may require further research, development, design and testing prior to implementation of a larger-scale commercial application. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that these technologies will perform successfully on a large-scale commercial basis or that they will be profitable to us or that our fuel will be cost competitive in the market.



That is directly from the manufacturer.

Everything surrounding this new BEHL "waste to energy" approach is still Phantasy.

Also, I have no confidence in the words. "Permits are not required for BEHL" That lie has been muttered several times in the past and has never been true. One more bit from the manufacturer.

Costs of compliance with burdensome or changing environmental and operational safety regulations could cause our focus to be diverted away from our business and our results of operations to suffer.

Liquid waste disposal and fuel production involves the discharge of potential contaminants into the water and air and is subject to various regulatory and safety requirements. As a result, we are subject to complicated environmental regulations of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and regulations and permitting requirements of the various states. These regulations are subject to change and such changes may require additional capital expenditures or increased operating costs. Consequently, considerable resources may be required to comply with future environmental regulations. We did not incur any capital expenditures for environmental control in 2010 or 2009 and we do not currently expect to incur material capital expenditures for environmental controls in this or the succeeding fiscal year In addition, our production plants could be subject to environmental nuisance or related claims by employees, property owners or residents near the plants arising from air or water discharges Environmental and public nuisance claims, or tort claims based on emissions, or increased environmental compliance costs could significantly increase our operating costs.