"I forgot to mention that Davis does include some 5-8 pages of the missing 73 pages in another section of the declaration...."
Maybe you missed this explanation of those pages in my earlier response to you......if you bothered to read it:
Please take note of Exhibit W, which is in support of:
"My review of transfer agent records indicates that the four Pensley letters resulted in the removal of the restrictive legend from 12,000,000 shares of Spongetech, and that the bulk of these shares were sold in the public market." (Document 2-4, Item 30.)
The shares issued as a result of those letters were issued earlier in 2007 than those referenced above, so the individual pages of the transaction journal (pp.30,31,45,46,54,55&69) showing those issuances were presented by the SEC as Exhibit W.
"......supposedly with a purpose....it appears as though that the SEC does things with a Design"
Of course they have a design...it's called Civil Action No. 10-CV-2031.
I'm tryin ta think but nuttin happens......Curly
