Brad, I have a suggestion. Your posts seem to be geared towards slinging deficate towards those that are saying Scam.
How about responding to those such as myself, who has been a General Manager of a Food Packaging plant of 300 employees, responsible for Marketing, Sales, Budgets, Inventory, Quality, Production, etc. in a way that represents HFBG in a professional manner?
Instead of “yelling” as if that will change anything or change anyone’s mind, how about “talking” to those of us who have been shareholders, have believed in the company, but have become somewhat standoffish in regards to validity of HFBG’s intentions?
Your posts resemble attempts to extinguish the “first liar wins” rule, instead of holding business discussions with business men, as if you and I were at a table talking over a beer.
I assure you, I have participated in these types of discussion for years, with Customers, Suppliers, Audit Personnel, Salesmen, Owners, Presidents and Vice Presidents of major food companies, such as Oscar Mayer, Kraft, General Mills, Tyson, Patrick Cudahy, Sara Lee and Abby land. Trust me, not all the subject matter of these interactions is pleasant, but we discuss, professionally, voice opinions without conjecture and resolve any situation. Most results are “ Plan, and let’s review in a few months”.
Why can’t HFBG(you) interact this way with it’s shareholders?
You are an asset to this board only if your input is reflected this way. When you maintain a business tone, a business interaction and “be the facilitator” of another wise out of control meeting and reach agreement at least, on the Plan, there can be harmony.
If you present information as if we were adults, with money invested and act as if you are talking to a Bank President , because we are the ones who are invested and essentially have loaned you the money in hopes of a return, the responses on the board may be a little more productive.
HFBG has a perceived “black eye”, but YOU are in a position to change that, instead all you do is respond to “scam” with information that is published in PR’s, albeit, more emphatic.
I assure you, if HFBG responds professionally, we will respond in kind.
When I asked about a P.O., a number, quantities, etc. a very professional response would of been “it is not allowed by our contract to discuss those details” or “it is felt it would cause issues to publish that information”, anything. Instead you throw out a lot of words, at no one in particular and are not really talking to anyone.
When have you replied to one of my personal posts and responded to me in a discussion between two professionals? I have asked you personally, simple questions with no response.
Continually posting the same information has the tone of believing this board is all encompassing as to whether HFBG is a GOOD Company or not. Why not let HFBG prove / continue to prove it is real and making progress through the NORMAL channels of PR's and Financial statements?
Just a heads up, if this continues, you are getting no where.
