BOMART and RICHARD HELLER death are SAME: May 2009.
Did SEC do his job and check Richard Heller?
Who are the TWO HIDDEN NAMES in that letter? -> http://viewer.zoho.com/docs/iccabdaj
I mean, Richard Heller is that guy who was sneaking inside SpongeTech offices and who met Speranza in the elevator (as per Thomas McGuire of the FBI)
Richard Heller was THE BIG BOSS at RME!
"The control persons of RM Enterprises are
RICHARD HELLER - Chief Executive Officer..."
http://www.secinfo.com/d16Ggw.1d.htm
"... according to George Speranza (GS), Heller overheard GS discussing GS's ability to create websites..."
http://www.justice.gov/usao/nye/vw/PendingCases/Complaint%20and%20Affidavit%20in%20Support%20of%20Arrest%20Warrants.pdf
Not me saying it, it's Thomas McGuire of FBI!
CRUCIAL QUESTIONS:
- At what EXACT date did Richard Heller died in May 2009? (David Bomart Letter is May 20, 2009)
- Did Richard Heller have access to fax machines in SpongeTech offices you think?
- What did Richard Heller died of?
- Did he receive a short term death diagnostic from his doctor? Did he decide to use his position at RME to "finish" some things before dying?
- Who are the TWO HIDDEN NAMES in Bomart letter? -> http://viewer.zoho.com/docs/iccabdaj
(in front of 1,000,000 and in front of 5,000,000)
- Are the TWO HIDDEN NAMES the SHAREHOLDERS Mr. Moskowitz is referencing below?:
---------------
From: steven@spongetech.com
Date: Thu, May 13, 2010 at 9:03 AM
Subject: Re: Lawyer
To: pilon.david@gmail.com
Your nuts
---------------
From: pilon.david@gmail.com
Date: Thu, May 13, 2010 at 8:59 AM
Subject: Re: Lawyer
To: steven@spongetech.com
"I don't think it was ever done" ??
Olde Monmouth was never fired by you and is still SpongeTech
transfer agent?? Aren't you pushing these games a little bit too
far here? Don't hide behind having to work. Today, and tomorrow,
you have no work to do other than to explain your actions in a
clear way. Not by playing games and trying to hide.
---------------
From: steven@spongetech.com
Date: Thu, May 13, 2010 at 8:54 AM
Subject: Re: Lawyer
To: pilon.david@gmail.com
I'm telling I don't think it was ever done anyways I have to get
work have nice day
---------------
From: pilon.david@gmail.com
Date: Thu, May 13, 2010 at 8:43 AM
Subject: Re: Lawyer
To: steven@spongetech.com
Was it you who fired Olde Monmouth? (as per item 90 on page 27 of
SEC complaint)
---------------
From: steven@spongetech.com
Date: Thu, May 13, 2010 at 8:37 AM
Subject: Re: Lawyer
To: pilon.david@gmail.com
You asked if I saw him
---------------
From: pilon.david@gmail.com
Date: Thu, May 13, 2010 at 8:34 AM
Subject: Re: Lawyer
To: steven@spongetech.com
If it never happened, and nobody was acting on your behalf inside
SpongeTech office, then why did you indicate this: "I have 119
people 5 fax machines"? C'mon Mr. Moskowitz! What kind of game
are you playing here?
---------------
From: steven@spongetech.com
Date: Thu, May 13, 2010 at 8:26 AM
Subject: Re: Lawyer
To: pilon.david@gmail.com
No it means it never happened
---------------
From: pilon.david@gmail.com
Date: Thu, May 13, 2010 at 8:21 AM
Subject: Re: Lawyer
To: steven@spongetech.com
BTW, I just wrote to 3 persons at Olde Monmouth and requested
them to provide me the e-mail where you fired them (as per item
90 on page 27 of SEC complaint). With this we will see exactly
from who it was coming from.
---------------
From: pilon.david@gmail.com
To: Steven Moskowitz
Sent: Thu May 13 08:18:41 2010
Subject: Re: Lawyer
That means someone else than you, inside SpongeTech office, was
acting on your behalf, correct?
---------------
From: steven@spongetech.com
Date: Thu, May 13, 2010 at 8:11 AM
Subject: Re: Lawyer
To: pilon.david@gmail.com
They can say what they want but we never spoke about
---------------
From: pilon.david@gmail.com
To: Steven Moskowitz
Sent: Thu May 13 08:09:08 2010
Subject: Re: Lawyer
SEC filed that you personally assured Olde Monmouth that Bomart
existed and that he worked out of your office on occasion. Why
did you tell Olde Monmouth that Bomart existed if you say you
have 119 people and 5 fax machines?
---------------
From: pilon.david@gmail.com
Date: Thu, May 13, 2010 at 8:46 AM
Subject: Re: Lawyer
To: steven@spongetech.com
Was that employee a consultant?
---------------
From: steven@spongetech.com
Date: Thu, May 13, 2010 at 8:27 AM
Subject: Re: Lawyer
To: pilon.david@gmail.com
No
---------------
From: pilon.david@gmail.com
To: Steven Moskowitz
Sent: Thu May 13 07:58:28 2010
Subject: Re: Lawyer
Is the employee you suspect done this still employed by
SpongeTech?
---------------
From: steven@spongetech.com
Date: Thu, May 13, 2010 at 7:53 AM
Subject: Re: Lawyer
To: pilon.david@gmail.com
I have 119 people 5 fax machines
---------------
From: pilon.david@gmail.com
To: Steven Moskowitz
Sent: Thu May 13 07:52:07 2010
Subject: Re: Lawyer
SEC filed that David Bomart sent a fax from your office. You
didn't see him do it?
---------------
From: steven@spongetech.com
Date: Thu, May 13, 2010 at 7:41 AM
Subject: Re: Lawyer
To: pilon.david@gmail.com
Don't know work for some shareholders
---------------
From: pilon.david@gmail.com
To: Steven Moskowitz
Sent: Thu May 13 07:40:03 2010
Subject: Lawyer
Hi Mr. Moskowitz, is it true that lawyer "David Bomart" does not
exist? (as per FBI and SEC complaints against you)
Who will answer ME these questions?
Is this what the SEC doesn't want us to know and are HIDING behind TWO MONTHS LONG so called FAKE "technical difficulties" and why they need a DUMMY "filter team"?
