InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 435
Posts 57599
Boards Moderated 5
Alias Born 01/09/2007

Re: fourkids_9pets post# 93218

Sunday, 04/17/2011 10:28:42 AM

Sunday, April 17, 2011 10:28:42 AM

Post# of 103340
as a follow on .. let me put this as simply as possible

2 runs orchestrated in 2009 netted X
<those curious trades also netted X>

then the turn enters the stock/exph
putting unrelenting pressure on the pps

the goal is always the cellar and the *ability*
to outlast shareholders .. because this isn't a
one off *exclusive* to expo/exph rather a well
coordinated effort done elsewhere too

along the way shares are shorted and covered

what gets interesting on exph is what happened
last summer at .0004 .. but i digress

all along the way .. frustration by sor re: the pps
forces ALL to make decisions .. as i've always posted

sit tight <hold> and wait out aspects
sell out .. wait for lower pps to re-enter
sell out .. and not re-enter
or add shares at specific price points based on DD

it's one of the reasons why i track volume and percentages
so assiduously

once i realized who <X entity> was .. it made all the rest
of the info far easier to piece together


i've never doubted the integrity of mgmt .. but i could
certainly understand the frustration longs felt re: pps


i'm dispassionate because none of this is a surprise to me
my time frame runs 3 to 5 years and i was more concerned
about mgmt's *ultimate* survival in 2008 and early 2010

what surprises me is that any expectation of mgmt putting
out info piecemeal <only aids and abets imo> vs. wanting
all info to come out in one fell swoop ~ determination is
made IN TOTAL .. when all info is put out


again the decision isn't mine to make .. but obviously
i'm on the side that it all comes at the same time ..

after all good mgmts' focus on their overall LONG TERM
prospects .. it's why conversations with locals who are
sor in exph .. matter

==
4kids
all jmo


10/5/07 -- there are no coincidences here ...
oh and like many other longs .. not selling at this level --