InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 22
Posts 4092
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/05/2010

Re: tmac7 post# 41441

Thursday, 04/14/2011 7:42:18 PM

Thursday, April 14, 2011 7:42:18 PM

Post# of 136066
I heard a lot of talk on basically the same subject of onlylegging.com. I heard that we will not have a 3rd store anytime soon. Again I heard that sales were good, but at the same time said that some days it was like $130.

What I did not hear was actual numbers that he made an excuse for as not having read the financials as he had just got them 15 min earlier. Which sounds legit.

Without having more stores like Lulu does, how can we possibly even come close to comparing to LULU and taking the challenge with them. Where has all the dilution gone, to pay the debt? Does that not equal on the back of the Shareholders?

Should have sold into the news as someone once stated. Again a Bravada PR that come tomorrow, I think the PPS backs up as with most of the PR's.

We thought dilution was for private lable, which I guess we have, we just do not have the money to buy the products. Then why did we spend the money for the label. How do we know we even have the label. That sounds like another excuse to me.

At least he sort of appologized for the sophisticated investor remark and clarified that statement.

I can appreciate him buying someone a Latte for the PR aspect of the business. No problem with that. A by all means, if you want someone to buy our more expensive items than what Target sells theirs for, by a better pair of shoes for yourself as you feet support you, which support us.
Sort of like telling people if you cannot afford good ones like Bravada, then go to Target. Heck! Big 5 Store would have been better choice.