InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 42
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/28/2005

Re: kenco post# 553

Friday, 04/29/2005 9:24:56 PM

Friday, April 29, 2005 9:24:56 PM

Post# of 22620
Correct me if I'm wrong but look at the following post which was apparently obtained by a poster on another board and posted by Kenco. To ME it appears someone is trying to imply a different scenario than it was written.. look at the statement and how the words are taken out of context:
from our own board it is written:

Posted by: kenco
In reply to: amx8559 who wrote msg# 546
Date:4/29/2005 11:56:27 AM
Post #of 554

Regarding the latest PR, an investor from another board has done some DD on this announcement and here is their report...

"I have contacted CSN about this statement in the press release:

Additionally, with regard to this project, MediaMax Technology will provide project management, production and quality control services as well as management of manufacturing relationships to make this strategic partnership successful. The short-term goal is to distribute 60 million CDs in North America and a total of 600 million units world-wide over the next 3 years generating a royalty of 4 to 6 cents per unit depending on volume.

I pointed out that the goal of 600 million CDs at 4 to 6 cents is a lot for an organization that distributes information for free to be paying to copy protect free information. He was unaware of the 600 million CD at 4 to 6 cents claim and assumed that the projection was related to SunnComm's business with other clients.

When I pointed out that the statement came after the "with regard to this project" clause, he assumes that it was a mistake, and should have been placed elsewhere."


now look at the above statement and how it was actually written,(via Kenco's post)I see the words "with regard to this project" as being located far above in the paragraph, (so it was "placed elsewhere" lol)but, it was asked/posted as tho they are implying to everyone that the next statement after that talks about the 600 million CDs. But, where it actually is in the statement is an entirely different sentence and doesn't really seem to go together. So of course it was a mistake, only by the way the question was approached. OH!!!! maybe thats why the SCMI board keeps deleting the posts with regards to this. JMHO