InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,599.19
(
0.40%
)
US TECH 100
19,994.20
(
0.42%
)
Dow Jones
39,393.82
(
0.26%
)
Brent Oil
85.11
(
0.48%
)
Bitcoin
57,825.33
(
-0.33%
)
Post# of 3649
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

ptolomeo

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 3
Posts 672
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/13/2010

ptolomeo

Re: None

Friday, 04/08/2011 4:53:57 AM

Friday, April 08, 2011 4:53:57 AM

Post# of 3649
Hello pals. I've got a question about Hs.

I don't follow this forum regularly, but have got a question I don't understand.

There is a clause that states that if FJR is applied to SNH, then Hs must make whole SNH.

But to my understanding it's different if a judge imposes FJR over CR as a punishment (in the case of the SNH would be for illegal trading activities) rather than for other motives.

Can this 'have to make whole' clause be argued or we have to take it as it is?

Thank you in advance.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up