InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 434
Posts 57599
Boards Moderated 5
Alias Born 01/09/2007

Re: TheProfit post# 92677

Friday, 04/01/2011 5:23:10 PM

Friday, April 01, 2011 5:23:10 PM

Post# of 103340
what is positive for me may not be positive for another
based on my experience and background

but expo positives running the gamut are:

co. is legit <products/employees/customers/facility>
co. has fortune 100/500 customers who are retained year in/out
co. has a solid shareholder base including local business persons
co. has an open door policy for all to visit and *observe*
co. has diversified their product lines in the last 20 months
co. holds an annual shareholders' meeting
co. employs approx 40 people
co. has their initial disclosure form on pink sheets
co. has fins uploaded to pink sheets thru fy 2009
co. has a TA that gives out OS and AS daily
co. has reg d info uploaded with the sec
co. is current with NV SOS
co. is current with NC SOS

mgmt holds restricted common shares <sharing the fate of sor>
mgmt expanded bod with the appointment of j. kendrick
mgmt has reduced PR's from *lots* in 2009 to few in 2010 <18>
mgmt has a shareholders section on their expo website where sor
can view job sites completed and check for latest info
mgmt is on record as stating they have never sold one share
mgmt articulated *clearly* why AS would be increased in 2010
mgmt articulated when the router went down and impact that *had*

===

having been a sor since aug 2008 .. i actually didn't expect
the co. to survive the market implosion of the fall <2008>
because as most know .. cash was hoarded .. COD was SOP
for materials .. anyone not understanding the impact that
would have on *plans* isn't sharing the same air space i am :)

ironically what kept me in exph in 2009 was mgmt converting
to restricted common from pref'd

where i believe mgmt tipped their hand to those who do manipulate
as naturally as breathing ~ was the CC held on july 28th 2009

most understand why mgmt wanted to spin off etc as a private
entity and then subsequently *couldn't* due to a share discrepancy
TDA would allow sells of exph but not buys as of 12/4/2009
<i believe that is still in force over a year+ later>

the 2nd time imo that mgmt came as close to shutting their
doors was early feb 2010 .. it's very clear that a relationship
existed with WW .. that literally <due to circumstances at WW>
went into limbo .. the result of that god awful Q was jd's
resignation as ceo .. AS being raised .. shares being issued
and a search for a new ceo while *imo* tough choices were faced

after feb 4th 2010 ~ i posted that i'd written off ETC for 2010

i also wouldn't have held the SM in sept 2010 .. due to mgmt
not being able to hand over a *imo* pristine balance sheet
resulting in the new ceo not being named *then*

i've suspected for months that debt will be ZERO <and perhaps
X amt of $$$ in place b4 the new ceo takes over> one of the
aspects i can't abide is stock manipulation .. i don't expect
to ever see *true* valuation while on OTC .. but i also don't
want to see exph run .. then shorted .. then run .. and so on

been there .. watched that .. no desire to see X entity do it again

my philosophy is very simple <and was in sept> if the stock's
pps is in the toilet to begin with .. leave it there until
FACTS delivered by mgmt dictate pps change .. that is what i
and other longs i interact with want

expo's transparency i'm expecting in 2011


fy 2010
fy 2011 Q1
forms filed for all insiders and beneficial owners
new BOD members and their bios
new CEO and his/her intent for co.s future <as in etc/cima/d&d>
new ceo's comp pkg and whether shares held are pref'd or common

i want exph to have their first ever content driven run based on FACTS out of mgmt

time will tell what comes to pass .. i've done the DD and as
comfortable as anyone can be with an unregistered co. on the OTC

==
4kids
all jmo

10/5/07 -- there are no coincidences here ...
oh and like many other longs .. not selling at this level --