InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,721.22
(
0.37%
)
US TECH 100
19,475.68
(
1.10%
)
Dow Jones
42,184.50
(
0.41%
)
Brent Oil
78.13
(
0.41%
)
Bitcoin
61,428.18
(
1.12%
)
Post# of 253274
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

exwannabe

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 91
Posts 17883
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/06/2006

exwannabe

Re: DewDiligence post# 117246

Tuesday, 03/29/2011 10:01:48 PM

Tuesday, March 29, 2011 10:01:48 PM

Post# of 253274
Nothing that sinister; they’re simply opposed to government regulation on ideological grounds and don’t realize how screwed up things would be if the FDA got out of the efficacy business.

Disagree,

Somebody on the WSJ editorial board clearly has a personal issue with the FDA,

The WSJ came out and supported CTIC on PIX. They are off their rocker on this one.

EDIT : I do agree it is not sinister. Just retarded.



Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up