InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 65
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/08/2011

Re: pascal30 post# 38196

Monday, 03/28/2011 4:27:38 PM

Monday, March 28, 2011 4:27:38 PM

Post# of 51977
Pascal,

You're right, investors do deserve to see a picture of the product, but pictures creates an emotional drive to believe after not believing or vice versa. I prefer documents and confirmation of the purchase order. When that is provided there is no backing out for SNRS. This will clearly prove if this company is real or not and the true meaning of scam can be used. In the recent PR, no LOI was used in the purchase order, but the word "scheduled" can be used to prolong the purchase order. PR's that are written with ambiguity is often used to find a way out if timelines or deadlines don't meet. But I am starting to see that the wording is becoming more concrete to the point where the Company is either legit or legally a scam. Chin should choose his words wisely, not to push the PPS upwards but to keep their freedom if this is scam.