InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 85
Posts 32827
Boards Moderated 86
Alias Born 03/22/2005

Re: in2it post# 36387

Friday, 03/18/2011 3:15:41 PM

Friday, March 18, 2011 3:15:41 PM

Post# of 50510
In2it, I would have liked to have known more about it, what the cellular changes were, what organ/tissue it was seen in, etc. But Schering was allowed to proceed with their own ADHD trial using Org-26576 (a Cortex-developed compound from the same period as CX-717), so the FDA was OK with allowing an Ampakine to be dosed longer term. To me it just seemed like the FDA (Psychiatric/Laughren) was prejudiced against Cortex for some reason, plus the FDA was under a lot of pressure at that time to be ultra conservative safety-wise.

As for the a-holes at R+R (Elemer Fudd, et al), who knows what their motivations were. Stoll had previously refused an R+R financing and went with Roth instead, so R+R was ticked at that and put in the .30 cent target as a lesson to other small cap companies. R+R also may have been trying to arrange a buyout on the cheap of Cortex for one of their vulture clients. The artifact was merely the factor that made a distress sale possible.



































Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent RSPI News