InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5
Posts 2693
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/28/2002

Re: mlsoft post# 52096

Thursday, 12/05/2002 10:40:05 AM

Thursday, December 05, 2002 10:40:05 AM

Post# of 704019
its amazing how much you have to dig to find the actual numbers. i didn't even see the word "seasonal adjustment" in the WSJ report, and had to follow a link to numbers presumably unmassaged by the ministry of labor statistics:

SEASONALLY ADJUSTED DATA

In the week ending Nov. 23, the advance figure for seasonally adjusted initial claims was 364,000, a decrease of 17,000 from the previous week's revised figure of 381,000. The 4-week moving average was 385,750, a decrease of 11,250 from the previous week's revised average of 397,000.

[...]

UNADJUSTED DATA

The advance number of actual initial claims under state programs, unadjusted, totaled 431,641 in the week ending Nov. 23, an increase of 58,985 from the previous week. There were 438,820 initial claims in the comparable week in 2001.

[...]

http://online.wsj.com/documents/bbjobs.htm

i don't quite understand why a "seasonal" winter adjustment (presumably to smooth out the numbers to better approximate 1/52 of a yearly rate?) should be so huge in winter ... isn't there more hiring going into xmas?

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.