Nonsense. He was either part of the conspiracy (likely, IMO) or woefully derelict in his obligations as an officer of the court to determine that there was some validity to the action. Consider his surly attitude about the matter since it was brought to his attention. That doesn't seem to me to square with your assertion that he was a deceived innocent.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.