InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 31
Posts 5404
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/15/2009

Re: inacent post# 18073

Thursday, 03/17/2011 12:26:03 PM

Thursday, March 17, 2011 12:26:03 PM

Post# of 31561
So I have a question based on this last bit of PR:

The final proof of that came in the form of recently released official independent test results from a large corporation, which does not want to reveal its name because of its leading position in the industry. The tests (conducted at that unnamed corporation’s own expense) confirm that, besides being a low-cost carbon-neutral solution to worldwide energy generation, Giant King Grass can in fact also be used to produce second-generation cellulosic biofuels, such as ethanol and butanol, in addition to biomass-based chemicals. And, unlike corn and wheat sources, it does it all economically and without impacting the food chain, essentially solving the two biggest issues faced by biomass.

So how is this final proof when nothing has been released and supposedly can't be because "a leading company" does not want their name used, Why? if they are leading what do they have to fear if they say this publicly? wouldn't they just not want any PR's about it if they had something to fear....LOL.

By the was hit the link at the bottom to blog and you see it goes to Quality Stock..so it looks like they are the soure of this PR and the liberal wording in it... by what an objective blog they have... not one hard question...LOL