RR works for NML and I personally know of other lawyers and vendors who have the exact experience. I have seen copies of bounced checks from Klepsy that have not been pursued through the courts for the same reason as Penman didn't sue. Not only that, but if the stiffed parties would win, which they would, they probably still wouldn't be able to collect. Klepsy has reneged on numerous settlements and ignored judgments in the past. In someone case he actually made settlement payments with bad checks.
Is this normal? Is this what one would expect from the CEO of a publicly traded company? I've never heard of this kind of behavior. It's nice to see someone finally publicly call out Klepsy.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.