austin01, I suspect that Brad is using the careful terminology we've also seen in Cooper's
statements. While the term "disruptive" isn't that far from "adjectival acceptability" - to put it in "correct" terms - imo, his reluctance to use that term during the webcast may well have stemmed from an overabundance of caution on his part to be conservative in his descripton of the tech's
prowess. It's definition, however, remains the same in that NVC's tech applications will cause a seminal alteration
as to what the world will accept as standard transmission rates upon our disruptive technology's being accepted as the normal state of affairs. I can imagine many telco CEO's falling into line awaiting NVC's "magic bullet" implementation to enhance their company's speed/distance upward to the new standard. Even after the passage of little more than 1/2 a day, since the news was announced about Tom Cooper's "reluctant" - his word - resignation, and assimilating its' implications, it's clearer to me than ever before that the company's inherent strengths will easily see it through the pending announcements this month and the funding, much discussed on the Webcast, will become much easier, it would seem, after the announcement, than before.
On a slightly different note, it was most encouraging to hear from the newly-posting s/h's, and I'd like to encourage others to join our ranks to add your thoughts to the proceedings. They would be most welcomed.
hitimer - Rob
AI
