Monday, March 07, 2011 2:40:54 PM
If I were Owens, I'd say - I'm giving QASP 25% - you folks decide anyway you want to split it up. I won't proceed until this matter is fully resolved and there's no overhang.
If I am Jeff, I'd be pressuring JC that his claims are meaningless while negotiating how much of my pre-RM debt is carried forward, rather than crammed into common.
If I am Dean, I am trying not to let everyone else throw me under the bus alone.
The outsider common holders are the party on the short end of the stick without a seat at the table - therefore the deal isn't going to get any better, and could be haircut quite a bit.
Or the whole RM plans becomes infeasible, and QASP fades to black.
FEATURED EzFill Holdings, Inc. Successfully Closes Acquisition of Shell Fleet, Accelerating Nationwide Mobile Fueling Expansion • Jan 7, 2025 8:35 AM
Fifty 1 Labs, Inc. Launches Dedicated Website for Shareholders and Investors, Company now current with OTC Markets • CAFI • Jan 7, 2025 9:00 AM
CGRA Signs Binding Term Sheet to Merge With American Infrastructure Corporation, a Subsidiary of Nasdaq-listed American Resources Corporation (Nasdaq: AREC) • CGRA • Jan 6, 2025 10:31 AM
UAV Corp (UMAV) Working on Securing $1.5 Billion in Contracts and Announces Groundbreaking Partnership with Atlantic Industrial Group • UMAV • Jan 6, 2025 9:26 AM
Basanite, Inc. to Open New Production and Distribution Facility in Northeast Ohio • BASA • Jan 2, 2025 8:28 AM
The Crypto Company Highlights Blockchain Training Alliance's Successes and Momentum for 2025 • CRCW • Dec 26, 2024 8:58 AM