InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 23
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/05/2011

Re: katano post# 18951

Sunday, 03/06/2011 2:50:33 PM

Sunday, March 06, 2011 2:50:33 PM

Post# of 129051
Concerning a patent for marijuana or its derived medicinal products.

I'm not sure that is necessary. Consider things like alcohol, tobacco or even tomatoes. There is no patent on those things and companies make billions selling them. Tomatoes are a great example, because they are the easiest thing on the planet to grow yet people spend more on 3 tomatoes than what they could spend on a bag of seeds. Medical grade marijuana is by far more difficult to grow than tomatoes, not to mention more expensive infrastructure and much more knowledge required to grow pharm. quality product, or being able to make quality cannabis oil etc.

Why go through all the trouble when you can go to the store and buy it quick and cheap? The demand will be high and Cannabis Science has the capital and infrastructure in place to move when the time comes and that time is coming quickly.

It would become blatantly corrupt to keep marijuana at Schedule 1 in the face of scientific evidence that it has medicinal value with the cannabis oil cure for cancer thing.

Anyone zoom in close on the photos from CSI's website? The lady goes from cancer to cured in 8 days.. This is easily repeatable and we shareholders are in position to reap the rewards of our funding the defeat of corruption.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.