InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 74
Posts 7117
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/31/2010

Re: Hobie3 post# 31880

Friday, 03/04/2011 1:40:37 PM

Friday, March 04, 2011 1:40:37 PM

Post# of 91121
Remember,in that fast moving scenario,it probably was not Bobs intention to post the 2nd PR w detailed offer info.

If it was Bobs intention to post detailed buyout info ,wouldn't he have included that detail with the first PR?

It has never been Bobs practice to nor does it make sense to post the 2nd PR only 1 day after the first.

We know that Bobs legal counsel advised Bob to post the 2nd PR.


The logical conclusion reached by many is that Bobs legal counsel advised Bob to post the 2nd PR(with buyout details)AFTER the 1st PR had been posted and AFTER talking with our friend.

So, case solved without maligning the reputation of a CEO who has been far more open and reachable than any CEO. Most people who have personally spoken with Bob have found him to be open and honest. The worse most have said is that he can be a bit naive-but aren't we all in some areas of life?

The upset poster,from his previous posts, had always found CEO Bob to be open and honest also.
The only logical conclusion is a misunderstanding based upon changed events-legal counsels advice-AFTER talking to our friend.