China MediaExpress Holdings, Inc. (fka CCME)

[GorillaGorilla]

Yes, the operative word is IF.

If management had sussed out that this were indeed MW why not just give them information that is consistent with their SEC documents? Why navigate towards a storm?

If your argument is that CCME wanted this situation then you would have to accept that they wanted a short piece written about them and Deloitte to go forensic on them. Is that really a wise course of action?

MW specifically asked for a proposal to be created by the operator for them. MW need to detail the proposal using a recorded transcript & QQ files - we know they record calls and we want that first call they made to CCME.

They were in constant contact with this person (Analyst:Just as I told you yesterday). They could have told her to phone back and recorded from the start - this they didn't do - you can't come into a conversation half way in - especially as they seem to spin the events (see below).

If this was a reverse sting, why not faithfully translate the conversation? Why imply the company [we] instead of the individual [I]? Why omit the proposal was created for them? Their handling of the translation suggests they have something to hide.

Finally, even MW don't think that is what happened only Herb Greenberg. Funny, how they don't want to use that defense. CCME shooting themselves in the foot just makes no sense.

rich