reading mjet post #396 on ragingbull, the same skepticism of keating should apply to you. between some random poster on ih/rb who tells people not to listen to an investment company's president and the president of the investment company, whom do you think i'll listen to? however, the difference between what you have been saying and what anyone says is that the filing backs up the theory of dilution. even if we choose not to believe keating, why should we discount an sec filing? i ask again, where is there a 3.8% figure in the current share structure?
goosemeister@hotmail.com