InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,487.03
(
0.25%
)
US TECH 100
19,430.40
(
0.14%
)
Dow Jones
38,834.86
(
0.15%
)
Brent Oil
84.70
(
-0.11%
)
Bitcoin
65,042.95
(
-0.15%
)
Post# of 118202
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

hinkydink

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 37
Posts 3890
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/22/2010

hinkydink

Re: nobody3 post# 36106

Monday, 02/28/2011 3:53:53 PM

Monday, February 28, 2011 3:53:53 PM

Post# of 118202
Was the "old" equipment still in place when they got the new equipment? If so, why not run "as is" while the new equipment is being set-up.

Size constraints of the building that houses it all maybe? Cost efficiency considerations? Couldn't they reprocess any runs done on "old" equipment if the "new" equipment proves to be so much better? Or would that not be cost effective?

Just thinking............

Would like to hear anyone's perspective on this.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up