Thank you for the compliments. I got "suckered in" by mistake. I do a daily search on my name to make sure I did not miss responding to a post directed to me. Someone must have mentioned my thread or my name here, so I looked this thing over, and then I saw that outrageous hope for $5/share, and had to respond, because too many people assume that if someone "think" (hope) for such a 200 bagger, it might happen, and tried to put some reality into that number ( the response was typical of most pumpers have met on the net when they do not have a rational response, do your own "DD", see my recent exchange with "Da-Cheif" on his target of $40/share for VLNC, when faced with number, he brought up "faith"). Then I decided to look a little deeper, since I suspected a typical "floorless in action", which soon discovered it was. I don't want to spend more time on that than I have to, so I'll bid all of you good bye, and warn again, floorless lead to the complete transfer of wealth from the public to the floorless bandits. On the way, they create few opportunities in minor ramps, but in general, the public is invariably left holding the empty bag.
Floating of various "hope generating" canards (always many in their bags, like suits, like "call in the certificates", like a big white knight to the rescue, and hundreds of other "hope generating" releases, are all engineered to let the bandits fleece more of the public). The bandits lawyers are smart in these matters since they have engineered tens of floorless, the company involved in a floorless is poorly guided through that legal maze because they did only one...
If someone suggests a stock is a good investment, one should be able to make a technical and fundamental case in less than three paragraphs (see my comments on a recent allen angel OMG), just saying "i think so", but I won't tell you "why I think so", is a sign of either a lazy investor or a pumper. You should listen to neither.
Zeev
