InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1515
Posts 35467
Boards Moderated 7
Alias Born 07/12/2004

Re: venomen2002 post# 91190

Thursday, 02/24/2011 9:07:03 PM

Thursday, February 24, 2011 9:07:03 PM

Post# of 103340
Veno : The burden of proof is always the company's responsibility ....any public company .

When EXPO refuses to prove any of their profound statements the market punishes the stock ....for any public company , and observers and skeptics will pile heaps of condescension on EXPO for their abject refusal to prove anything . That's what happens to public companies that grandstand tremendous successes and then dilute like tapwater because they need money . The contradictions are glaring and the EXPO MGMT who are responsible for the contradictions are reprehensible !

Had EXPO provided rock solid proof of anything of which they had no problem in press releasing the stock would have found support .

Support for the stock would have resulted in a fraction of the dilution . Imagine PROOF for " insiders haven't sold one cotton-pickin share since inception " ( paraphrased in my inimitable way ) , or PROOF of the Harris Tweeter contract , or PROOF of
Walmart , shizzam .....PROOF of any blinkity blink thing ?

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=54552558

EXPO was obviously not prepared to prove anything or they would have done so . So .....the old saying , ' keep your big yap shut if ya can't or won't prove it ' would have been the responsible thing for EXPO to do , instead of releasing earth-shatteing news releases with zippidy-do-dah no proof .

EXPO's BIGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG MOUTH and then refusal to prove anything is the reason EXPH is at .0001 , well , that and 2.3 billions of freshly minted shares sold at really ugly discounts .

Just once how about insisting that EXPO prove things ....sheesh ....ANYTHING .

To bite the worm of incite is to bite the HOOK of the antagonist . They win .