One Step Ahead

[Bo14172]

Morning Jim. Then all the more reason for
the Frizzle count to continue. If by your post you are saying the T/A would be clueless if there is a massive naked shorting problem, (You're saying only issued shares and legends are all they have), then the Frizzle count is a must.

Mind you, I don't buy your argument because how else is the T/A going to have a list of shareholders unless it comes from the DTC or brokers? I believe the T/A knows without a doubt of any NSS problem. All I'm saying is, "Fine, let's continue the Frizzle count and compare that number with the T/A's. I bet it's higher than even the T/A is showing."

62,255,787,908 shares with only 662 signed agreements currently.

If you take this number times 12, you have in excess of the ENTIRE OUTSTANDING SHARE TOTAL. The 62 billion IS 1/83 OF THE LIKELY SHAREHOLDER BASE!! This count is simply a new revelation we cannot ignore and must continue to the fullest extent possible!

http://www.cmkxownersgroup.com/

If we assume 55,000 shareholders, then there is 54,338 to go. : )

Currently the 62,255,787,908 represents only 1/83 of the shareholders (assuming a 55,000 shareholder base).

If I'm wrong on how the T/A in this case confirms their numbers, then fine. But I believe there has to be some form of reporting from the DTC, brokers, etc back to the T/A of the executed trades and balances. If there is such a report given back to the T/A, all I'm saying is match that number with the Frizzle count.

Given the above count so far, it would seem possible that the Frizzle count will exceed the float by a very large amount.
That's the bottom line of my interest and enthusiasm of this effort.

The number itself is what is important. Comparisons with any DTC numbers (or T/A's numbers) only shed a more glaring light on any type of cover up.

62 billion with only 662 shareholders counted is an amazing statistic. Someone close to Frizzle needs to persuade him to consider reducing his price dramatically for the sole reason of including a large number of shareholders in this count, or offer some way that IS VERIFIABLE that shareholders own in excess to the float.

I would not be interested in Frizzle at all if he was not formally conducting this share count AND THE NUMBERS WEREN'T THIS IMPRESSIVE. If he was showing 5-10 billion shares for the 662 shareholders, I wouldn't even be posting about this. The 62 Billion/662 Shareholder ratio is eye opening to say the least. The fact that he has a limited role under the lead counsel of Stocklein is also a plus.

With time a factor (14 days until the scheduled hearing), that is the reason for a sense of urgency to accelerate this count.

Bo