Global Diversified Industries Inc (GDIV)

[mike306oh]

Hilarious postings:

I just checked out some of the other boards. I just wanted to see if I can get a clue of why after all these great news lately, the PPS is still jumping up and down as a pink-pong ball.

http://www.boardcentral.com/aios/aios.cgi

1. From RB:

Posted by Wisky17:

”speed,don't get down on daytraders to much here,,this is how i trade this stock and have made a ton!,,,also take in account that it's the daytraders that bring the volume up in most case's which in return brings in new investors having seen the volume spike up. Of course this is just my opinion having seen it many times in the OTCBB.”

And, then (in another post) the same “playboy” comes up with the most hilarious part:

“I don't mind helping the Gov. with my extra $$$$$$,,,after all,,,i've made more then they have. Greed is the # 1 killer in penny stocks in my opinion when people wait for the grand slam that never comes. In some cases it does,,,but not that often. JMO”

The hilarious part is that this individual is calling the longs: “Greedy.” He doesn’t seem to know the meaning of the word “greedy.” The individual that is playing pink-pong games with a stock that is poised for a great growth is not only a very greedy person, but also not very smart, IMO. Last year he was posting carbon copy of today’s remarks, but he disappeared from sight when (at the end of April, beginning of May) all of the sudden the PPS jumped from below 0.07 to 0.285 in a matter of days. This time around with so much more going on with this company taking a chance is not a very smart move.

2. The following question about the strange PPS behavior was raised by “Warrenadair” from the Market Watch board.

“Anybody have a clue as to what's going on? Down from .1 to .085, 18% in last two trading days (but did just upticked to .09 with trade at 1:12 P.M.). Sudden drop on moderate volume yesterday. Not much volume today. No new news reports and probably not enough volume to indicate insider trading. Maybe the "playboys" are getting back in and messing things up.”

If I understood it correctly, I liked the part where he’s calling the day traders: “playboys.” Silly “playboys” I might add.

This company is as we speak experiencing an explosive growth ($25+MM contracts, compared to peanuts same time last year). Why do I call these "playboys" silly? Simply because they (That are not greedy, he, he) only go for the peanuts. The true longs want to get (and they will get it) the full reward. These “playboys” (I love Warren’s definition) won't be able to keep it down for too long. In fact, I expect it to start moving any day now. And with the rather small volume (even if I won’t be greedy, he, he) I won’t take the chance to be left out. I bet plenty of good news will come our way in the very near future, and one of them shall trigger the move back to the 30’s (at least). Once that price is reached with all this dramatic improvements in the company’s prospects (e.g., AMEX listing) the price should not come back again the way it did last year. This company is one of the very few penny stocks that one gets the most out of by keeping it long because of the capital gain taxes, plus less headache. I made this experiment years back with Keithley (KEY?). I bought in there two small packages: one that I kept from around $1 to around $100, when I sold it (it took just over one year), and an equal number of shares that I traded the peaks and valleys. Although by doing it I ended up with some 3 times as many shares as initially I had, the net gain I maid (after taxes) was quite a bit smaller than that in the first category. Plus, all that headache in baby-sitting the price all the time.

Mike