I agree 100%....you are correct....but, the pr was misleading and w/out merit....you seem like a smart person....I'm sure you agree we need to see the data & check the validity of the measures.....all they've stated is,
"Some of these scientifically informed patients have chosen to self-administer Cannabis Science extracts supplied by Rockbrook to treat their own cancers. Cannabis Science is delighted that patients are reporting dramatic improvements in their conditions, including basal cell carcinoma, non-small cell lung cancer accompanied by COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), ovarian cancer, and glioma."
....what kind of scientific study is that?.....seriously....you need thousands of participants over a long period of time to have a legit study.....this is lacking both the numbers and the length to prove anything significant....this is the example they gave...
"For example, a patient with basal cell carcinoma used a topical formulation to dramatically and rapidly eliminate her obvious skin cancer. Meanwhile, patients with internal tumors used oral formulations for their treatment. We currently await more complete clinical evaluations of the patients’ own reports of dramatic health improvements coincident with tumor shrinkage and disappearance."
re read this: "We currently await more complete clinical evaluations of the patients’ own reports of dramatic health improvements coincident with tumor shrinkage and disappearance."
"await more complete clinical evaluations" I repeat...."await more complete clinical evaluations"....they are telling us the data is incomplete....they are basing their claims on clients from their dispensary's comments....talk about conflict of interest....if you look at the example they used on their website it's a woman from Queensland Australia.....not from the U.S. Colorado based Rockbrock dispensary thye're partnered w/.....this hardly constitutes a legitimate FDA study.....they're on the right track, but need to step it up & do a legitimate study....they're basing their data on 600 peer reviewed articles, but what we need is the data from their study....not the 600 others....this should be about CBIS....at this point it's just hearsay until we get the facts.....if you're talking about curing cancer, you've got to back it up.....CBIS shareholders need to know if THEIR products work.....it's great other companies/Dr.'s have come up w/ treatments, but that doesn't automatically make theirs legit.....there are a ton of uncontrollable variables when dealing w/ canabanoids....they need to prove they have the right formulas and products....at this point we have nothing to go by.....the Dr. needs to hold a press conference like they stated in the pr and discuss the data and the treatments they're using....until then, this is nothing more than a pump in dump....I would love to see them break the barriers and come up w/ legitimate marketable products....at this point, they're a long way from pulling it off$$$
