Wednesday, February 23, 2011 12:49:11 PM
Do you feel that BTDG has any responsibility let alone fiduciary duty to shareholders to do any review of whether there is any report stating there are 1.5 million ounces of gold reserves on a property they claim to have done a deal on ?
Part of the problem is they announced that in a press release, and quoted Firma Gold, but nothing has been filed supporting that figure which is of course very material to BTDG. And what is filed does have blanked out sections (i.e. apparently of names) and doesn't refer to any reserves.
Let's say the reserves exist, surely more is needed than just Firma Gold saying so !
I have to admit the frustrating thing is that BTDG avoids addressing this very simple issue.
What is also of concern is that if Firma Gold mislead BTDG certainly BTDG would inform the public, instead it appears they are still doing business with Firma Gold.
What is the real story ?
VAYK Exited Caribbean Investments for $320,000 Profit • VAYK • Jun 27, 2024 9:00 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Successful Flotation Cell Test at Bishop Gold Mill, Inyo County, California • NBRI • Jun 27, 2024 9:00 AM
Branded Legacy, Inc. and Hemp Emu Announce Strategic Partnership to Enhance CBD Product Manufacturing • BLEG • Jun 27, 2024 8:30 AM
POET Wins "Best Optical AI Solution" in 2024 AI Breakthrough Awards Program • POET • Jun 26, 2024 10:09 AM
HealthLynked Promotes Bill Crupi to Chief Operating Officer • HLYK • Jun 26, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec's Howco Short Term Department of Defense Contract Wins Will Exceed $1,100,000 for the current Quarter • BANT • Jun 25, 2024 10:00 AM