InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 10
Posts 1681
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/17/2010

Re: Edmond post# 7207

Wednesday, 02/23/2011 12:49:11 PM

Wednesday, February 23, 2011 12:49:11 PM

Post# of 55129

Do you feel that BTDG has any responsibility let alone fiduciary duty to shareholders to do any review of whether there is any report stating there are 1.5 million ounces of gold reserves on a property they claim to have done a deal on ?

Part of the problem is they announced that in a press release, and quoted Firma Gold, but nothing has been filed supporting that figure which is of course very material to BTDG. And what is filed does have blanked out sections (i.e. apparently of names) and doesn't refer to any reserves.

Let's say the reserves exist, surely more is needed than just Firma Gold saying so !

I have to admit the frustrating thing is that BTDG avoids addressing this very simple issue.

What is also of concern is that if Firma Gold mislead BTDG certainly BTDG would inform the public, instead it appears they are still doing business with Firma Gold.

What is the real story ?