One Step Ahead

[Bo14172]

Voodooman,

The current issues of the hearing rightfully have brought about a lot of discussion. This will continue to be the case as it should.

For me, I've been consistant in posting that I desire 2 things from this hearing:

1) CMKX gets through this. Like I said in the past, it will be tough but it's 'doable'. After seeing yesterday's Answer and the specific proactive discussion and CYA letter by Atty Stocklein to Special Counsel O'Neill, I see it as very possible.

Leadership under Maheu has impressed me. His trust in Donald Stocklein, Esq. is simply another correct decision in my opinion.

So let's through this WITH CURRENT LEADERSHIP IN PLACE, and simply become a company which works hard to use it's resources and potential to grow company value while improving share structure.

When I say "WITH CURRENT LEADERSHIP IN PLACE", that means: (onto point #2 on what I desire from this hearing)

2) Have the SEC judge punish and or oust the entire leadership team prior to Mr. Maheu.

I've posted many times on the failings and the very questionable practices of prior leadership, and I fully expect this to be under scrutiny at the hearing. The Action filed by the SEC and Answer filed by CMKX will lend itself to this discussion by SEC counsel and certainly the judge at the time of the hearing. It won't be pretty. The Answer certainly shows current leadership as dilligent and acting in good faith, giving every argument for the judge to leave CMKX (the company) in place and deny the SEC action. However, when the judge fills in the gap on how the entire group of UC & friends ABUSED their leadership roles and squandered the potential of the claims CMKX owns, and instead dilute the market with shares to the sky and back 703 billion times over, I predict she will act swiftly and with impunity against UC & friends.

Discussion will eventually get around to what my crystal ball was showing me last month:

http://investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=5642467

http://investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=5642753

http://investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=5645060

Discussion will get to this point likely after the hearing occurs.

After this dust clears, then it will be sweet to focus on real efforts by the company to grow the potential they have.

Then, and only then will it be an appropriate time to address any NSS issue if such is in play.

The 2 hammers that have pounded on each side of investors has been dilution (fault of prior management) and cellar boxing (fauly of MM's et al).

They are 2 big trees to topple. I believe the judge is going to take out one of those trees at the hearing. My earlier posts provide an out of the box theory why I believe this had to occur.

Bo