InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 51
Posts 4564
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/14/2009

Re: None

Tuesday, 02/22/2011 3:36:56 AM

Tuesday, February 22, 2011 3:36:56 AM

Post# of 2724
New published article of Dr Schalk(medical advisory board)

Received: 25 June 2010; Paper pending published: 07 September 2010;
Accepted: 06 January 2011; Published online: 07 February 2011.

Edited by:
Carsten Mehring, Imperial College London, UK
Reviewed by:
Andrea Kubler, University of Wuerzburg, Germany
Ferran Galan, Newcastle University, UK
Nick F. Ramsey, University Medical Center Utrecht, Netherlands

Title:
"Rapid communication with a “P300” matrix speller using electrocorticographic signals (ECoG)"

link:
http://www.frontiersin.org/neuroprosthetics/10.3389/fnins.2011.00005/abstract

"A brain–computer interface (BCI) can provide a non-muscular communication channel to severely disabled people. One particular realization of a BCI is the P300 matrix speller that was originally described by Farwell and Donchin (1988). This speller uses event-related potentials (ERPs) that include the P300 ERP. All previous online studies of the P300 matrix speller used scalp-recorded electroencephalography (EEG) and were limited in their communication performance to only a few characters per minute. In our study, we investigated the feasibility of using electrocorticographic (ECoG) signals for online operation of the matrix speller, and determined associated spelling rates. We used the matrix speller that is implemented in the BCI2000 system. This speller used ECoG signals that were recorded from frontal, parietal, and occipital areas in one subject. This subject spelled a total of 444 characters in online experiments. The results showed that the subject sustained a rate of 17 characters/min (i.e., 69 bits/min), and achieved a peak rate of 22 characters/min (i.e., 113 bits/min). Detailed analysis of the results suggests that ERPs over visual areas (i.e., visual evoked potentials) contribute significantly to the performance of the matrix speller BCI system. Our results also point to potential reasons for the apparent advantages in spelling performance of ECoG compared to EEG. Thus, with additional verification in more subjects, these results may further extend the communication options for people with serious neuromuscular disabilities."


Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.