InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 10
Posts 1681
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/17/2010

Re: Edmond post# 7105

Sunday, 02/20/2011 3:04:15 PM

Sunday, February 20, 2011 3:04:15 PM

Post# of 55129
The report itself has sections blanked out so it is obvious someone modified report. The author certainly objected to the report being used by BTDG and claimed in her post there are no reserves on the property she looked at.

Let us assume report only filed for background material, and geologist is not sure of what she wrote.First it seems there is a question whether report altered, then geologist says it is, then people asked what she did about it.

I would like your direct opinion :

1. Do you believe BTDG has 1.5 million ounces of gold reserves
2. Do you believe there should be some back up filed ?
3. Do you believe that if Firma Gold fooled BTDG, that BTDG should let investors know ?

I am objective, there could be 1.5 million ounces of gold on the property. But there is not 1 single piece of disclosure by BTDG that indicates that actuality or even potential.

Why avoid the simple question, i.e. BTDG announced in a press release there was 1.5 million ounces of gold (headline), and in body of realease that Firma Gold told them that. Surely considering the huge potential shareholder value for this it would it not behoove BTDG to gather information on this ? Surely if CEO an honest man he doesn't intentionally wish to mislead investors ? And if mistake made why not just say so in a retraction ?