InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 4227
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/27/2004

Re: None

Friday, 02/18/2011 7:37:24 PM

Friday, February 18, 2011 7:37:24 PM

Post# of 30337
Here is the way I look at the Rainbolt situation.

1. He took on a public company and a public company in distress. He had no issue with producing PR’s that hyped his program and he put out PR’s making a litany of promises. But it seems from what Ault is portraying, Rainbolt quit this “great opportunity” because he didn’t want to deal with investors who were upset that he made promises he couldn’t keep. What exactly did he expect? Rainbolt stated what he would provide investors in January, is it their fault he stopped providing this?

2. Rainbolt quit so that he could be putting his expertise in the field. Pure garbage. Rainbolts very extended family may have field experience in oil but Rainbolt has zero. The resume he posts shows zero Oil Field experience. His jobs in California had nothing to do with Oil and neither did his role as IR for Ault in his crooked business.

3. If Rainbolt quit because he couldn’t handle the limelight and will work in the fields, what is the story with Atkins who is a finance guy. Was he harassed as well? Is he now a field guy as well? Why is ZLUS giving them a compensation package for quitting if they still work for the company in a different capacity?


But heck, why deal with these issues when that recidivist con man Ault tells you all is well. How many more lawsuits can he he get filed against him?

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.