Discreet, The one thing that Laidlaw longs dislike is balance of opinion and documents. You will note that none of you are focusing AT ALL on the closing statement that appears on PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION LETTERHEAD. Why is that Discreet? Do you suppose for a minute that you don't wish to divulge the entirety of closing arguments that might not suit the need of an upward pps thrust as a result of only disclosing the positive and not the negatives? Is that fair to a "newbie" lleg investor Discreet?
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.