InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 27
Posts 6485
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 10/16/2004

Re: underdog150 post# 90548

Thursday, 02/17/2011 1:12:11 AM

Thursday, February 17, 2011 1:12:11 AM

Post# of 103340
You seem to be confused..That should not be the case..It was very easy to get the answer to your question and still is..

"My question was, why was this recent recent A/S raise done on the Nevada SOS site listed as an STOCK SPLIT when all the other A/S raises were listed as Amendment's"..

The document is listed as an action and an amendment..It served two functions..It notified all shareholders of the increase of shares..It also notified all shareholders that the company can do a stock split from this point forward..

It is not a case for fraud in any sense..It does show all shareholders that they have filed with the SEC that the board has voted and approved a split and can now do so whenever they choose..Why don't you see that on the other increases?? Because they just now voted on it..You are correct..the company and other friendlies have the majority of shares and the company can pass anything they wish to pass with those shares accounted for..The filing in no way means they have to do a split right now or at any time..

Again the shareholder that sold their shares has no recourse against the company because of a filing that gives the company the right to do a split..Like I said..it is up to each shareholder to get all facts and buy..sell and hold as they choose..

All that I stated above is a fact and not disproven by anyone..


Now all of that is easily verified with one phone call..It is up to each individual to decide if they want that information verfied or not..Like I said it takes just one phone call..Saying that and individual has the right to recourse against the company because of the filing is not only wrong..it is without merit..

On another note..I am very happy that another link to Window World has been found other than the one I found today..It is great to see that they still are in close with EXPO..I like the fact that EXPO is growing and adding other sources of revenue as well..

I also like the fact that once again volume has dried up to just a trickle of the OS..If EXPO can now operate on what they have coming in as they have stated and no more dilution is needed..I would say from here until the material events show up..it should stay that way..My guess is that there are very little shares..in terms of overall percentage held by average retail investors and or traders at this point..That the vast majority of shares are being held by management and several others that are very close to the company and they are not going to part with those shares easily..

The company's plan as was stated was to move away from "single project based customers to customers that need to replenish stock on a regular basis."

I do believe that the company will move in that direction and that the process has already started...veno




To each their own..do your own DD..and the longs win here..All others are non shareholders or flippers..