InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 4
Posts 726
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/07/2010

Re: dade post# 20323

Wednesday, 02/16/2011 9:16:39 PM

Wednesday, February 16, 2011 9:16:39 PM

Post# of 85070
I am not sure that "partnership" is accurate, seems that the "other" contractual entity is larger by appreciable degrees, such as they have superior software in place and a marketing platform that is as comprehensive as any platform anywhere, and most importantly Metatron has been left in a position to defer to the larger entity for verification of the deal. If the contractual business arrangement were less than suggested or insignificant, it is inconceivable that management at Metatron would have devoted two weeks worth of energy, spinning its wheels in vain. That does not follow suit with the actions of the company that preceded the first blog about the deal on Feb. 3rd nor does it resonate with the respectful tone of the IR's blog today. Much ado about nothing? I think not...since this deal seems to have Metatron refocused, it must indeed be something big for Metatron, perhaps in scalar proportions not game changing for the other party, but, don't think that means that the other entity is not interested in Metatron, they must want something or see Metatron as being the right path to pursue or else there would NOT be a contract/ done deal. In any event, if Metatron can get a contract with any of the larger concerns it is a important endorsement, at the least.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent MRNJ News