InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,075.18
(
1.29%
)
US TECH 100
17,043.20
(
1.73%
)
Dow Jones
38,517.74
(
0.73%
)
Brent Oil
87.55
(
1.31%
)
Bitcoin
66,723.47
(
-0.20%
)
Post# of 34471
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

UpstateChris

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 24
Posts 2159
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/30/2010

UpstateChris

Re: chensiona post# 17192

Sunday, 02/13/2011 12:27:56 PM

Sunday, February 13, 2011 12:27:56 PM

Post# of 34471
Let's also keep in mind that the majority of the negativity (from CNBC and others) regarding SPAC's was AFTER CCME did their RM. If I am not mistaken, to IPO takes a MINIMUM of 3 annual audited sets of returns plus far more money than the RM. So from CCME's standpoint, save 3 years, save money, no negatives (that they were aware of or that were really an issue at that time). If you were the CEO why would you have NOT gone down that path at that time with the information you had?

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up