InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 68
Posts 16457
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/04/2007

Re: amj23 post# 235797

Thursday, 02/10/2011 2:46:37 PM

Thursday, February 10, 2011 2:46:37 PM

Post# of 362422
you had me going until you posted the wrong rule; rule 10b-5 that you posted has nothing to do with getting emails from IR.

I actually read the rule 10b-5 that you posted, and I don't think you did. 10b-5 is about fraud and deceit.

The regulation you need to look at is Regulation FD.

First off, there's nothing in DK's e-mails which gives anyone an unfair advantage. Why don't you take any one of the e-mails and show how it could be considered an unfair advantage. A demonstration is in order.

Second, while I can't speak for Julius, I know that I NEVER traded on anything before posting. In fact, if I sell, it will always be long term capital gain or loss, meaning, having held it for a year at least.

Third, I agree that all information should be disseminated to ALL shareholder's at the same time. The problem is that people need CLARIFICATIONS to information, that is why EVERY publicly traded company has an IR department...to clarify PR's and other information.

Fourth, I would love for DK to get an IR account and post here and answer questions. Other publicly traded companies do this LEGALLY, and can link answer to their corporate websites.

Fifth and finally, what you did is extinguish Dan K, without providing an alternate solution. Do you realize that now everytime a shareholder wants information, they will NOT use SNP as an excuse, they will use AMJ as an excuse.

Krombacher