Biotech Values

[tinkershaw]

A total of 31 samples were removed due to insufficient quantity, breakage or failing pre-specified quality control criteria.

Yes, I notied that. It also does not indicate how far along in pregnancy the results were taken. It is imperative, commercially (and medically) for the results to be in the first trimester. Which of course is also the most difficult period to make this sort of measurement.

SQNM could have been a lot more straight-forward. Those are two key pieces of information not disclosed. Oversight? Perhaps, but SQNM management knows more than anyone what is material and what shareholders want to know. And they did not provide the timing data and the ITT is the real world data. I suppose the 31 insufficient samples could be due to simply bad nursing in regard to obtaining the samples, and this can be corrected. So not necessarily something sinister there. But the date of samples is an extremely material data point that was not disclosed.

Tinker