InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 110
Posts 6480
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/01/2003

Re: Riddakilla post# 29383

Thursday, 02/10/2011 1:16:58 PM

Thursday, February 10, 2011 1:16:58 PM

Post# of 92948
Ridda,


With regards to ACT holding off for that long so they can run trials in parallel doesn't make any logical sense to me and I can think of no major benefit in doing so, jmo. ACT has said the following many times:

The SMD was chosen to be first in trial because:
(stated by ACT)
a)Highest likelihood of seeing signal in Phase I
b)Significance of Market Exclusivity: Barrier to Entry
c)The only practical choice for first clinical trial involving
RPE cells for macular degeneration.


Also, it would be a different line of thinking for me if the SMD IRB protocol was approved but it is not and sounds like it may be a while.

Non-dilutive funding? Ridda, they have plenty of cash to move forward with SMD and if non-dilutive funding comes in later then apply it but I can't imagine ACT holding back on starting for that reason especially when you are talking about many months on delay.
I have no doubt a reason exists for the delay but I don't see either of those issues being the cause.jmo

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.