Well, the responses have been your a liar! I think he should have rebutted why he didn't lie in the last article.
The main points of this article would seem to be:
1) Apollo designs advertising and is not an advertiser
2) Shanghai Apollo's SAIC filings are for no more than RMB 300K - so they can't possibly have put the order in.
3) Show us more advertisers you use.
I obtained its SAIC report from Shanghai Administration of Industry & Commerce in December 2010, and an electronic copy can be found here. The document shows that it reported revenues of RMB 138k in 2006, RMB 248k in 2007 (Page 15, top left) and RMB 58k in 2008 (Page 20, top right).
If you look at the document it has a number of years including at the bottom of page 017 over the stamp 2003, page 016 over the stamp 2004, page 004 over the stamp 2007, then you see the 2007 to 2009 documents. It's a bit odd but it's going to take a Chinese reader to comment on it properly
rich
