Wednesday, April 06, 2005 11:52:43 AM
Are you being intentionally obtuse?
I said the future survival of the company is tied directly to the pps;
"The pps MUST respond if the company is to survive."
You counter by suggesting that the connection is barely tangible and then say;
A new discovery, a new alliance, a patent issued, or several patents issued, all or anyone could change the course of this company at any moment.
Just how would such occurances "change the course of the company"?
Wait for it..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.......BY INCREASING THE PPS!
They are not loosely braided shoestrings or ropes..they are 'welded' together and they will survive or perish together.
The pps MUST respond or the company is doomed.
regards,
frog
Freedom Holdings Corporate Update; Announces Management Has Signed Letter of Intent • FHLD • Jul 3, 2024 9:00 AM
EWRC's 21 Moves Gaming Studios Moves to SONY Pictures Studios and Green Lights Development of a Third Upcoming Game • EWRC • Jul 2, 2024 8:00 AM
BNCM and DELEX Healthcare Group Announce Strategic Merger to Drive Expansion and Growth • BNCM • Jul 2, 2024 7:19 AM
NUBURU Announces Upcoming TV Interview Featuring CEO Brian Knaley on Fox Business, Bloomberg TV, and Newsmax TV as Sponsored Programming • BURU • Jul 1, 2024 1:57 PM
Mass Megawatts Announces $220,500 Debt Cancellation Agreement to Improve Financing and Sales of a New Product to be Announced on July 11 • MMMW • Jun 28, 2024 7:30 AM
VAYK Exited Caribbean Investments for $320,000 Profit • VAYK • Jun 27, 2024 9:00 AM