InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 109
Posts 25824
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/03/2010

Re: griff100 post# 56637

Tuesday, 02/08/2011 10:07:34 AM

Tuesday, February 08, 2011 10:07:34 AM

Post# of 86719
Griff100, balanced is fair enough. Everyone gets to make better decisions, here and in life. The more informed the better.

Acknowledging that DKAM's past was pretty much a "long" investors apocalypse is self evident and something I have to live with each day.

However not acknowledging there actually are some positives happening is not being balanced at all.

Until the next 10Q, I really don't care as I have stated before if the stock didn't trade a share. I like seeing it look good, but if it didn't trade until we had new news to discuss, I would be fine with that. If it went down to .001 I would have to buy DKAM because when the revenues are reported, it will bounce just because that's the nature of these penny stocks.

So I am fine with whatever is said on this board. Mr. Bill has a point to make. I just think the past is seen with great clarity, and the future opportunities are brewing right now. A different perspective of what's going on more akin to the current circumstances is perfectly reasonable and balanced.

DKAM really may not make it. They may not come close to my own conservative revenue estimates of $250,000 - $350,000 in which case everything will be a great disappointment.

However if the report is within the range, there really can be no dispute something better will be going on at DKAM.