InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 4
Posts 576
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/21/2008

Re: awesomebummer post# 16717

Tuesday, 02/08/2011 4:44:28 AM

Tuesday, February 08, 2011 4:44:28 AM

Post# of 64475
What am I saying...? I'm saying that taking action against PGPM is not the answer, it will only delay matters. See post #

16627


I believe Matt has his hands full trying to resolve the issues with the ACLY, but it's not happening as "SOON" as "WE" would like to see it; but putting him (PGPM) in the ring just to throw punches at him isn't going to speed things up either.
The last time I looked, Matt was one of us; a shareholder in PGPM. Believe me, Matt wants this resolved just as much as we do; perhaps more.
Don't assume that I'm fearful just because I don't support an attack against PGPM. One has to count the cost. If PGPM doesn't have the funds to get at least one of the wells back in operation, then where would they get the funds to fight "A"(As in one guy) shareholder?
JMO
2hars