Thanks guys (kezzek / Spartak) for the civility here.
I've held and lowered my cost per share since 2009. If I knew then what I know now ... you know.
DKAM hasn't been kind to me, but I haven't "realized a loss" yet, so right now it's just like a buried treasure, that may or may not be found.
My intention is to wait around for the 10Q to see what the revenue development looks like.
I honestly see the potential for revenues in the next 10Q of $250,000 - $350,000, and if it's so, then there is the chance to grow out of the red over 12 - 36 months. My opinion only. If that's the scenerio, I'll hang around for a long time. What choice do I have now? Really, what's my choice?
It's a tough story to see anything positive in its past. There's no need to be a pumper. DKAM is what it is.
I need plenty more than half a penny growth. Lot's of "pennies" are a trader's delight, and they are for companies not selling anything.
At least DKAM is 4 months in to a product roll out I thought was going to start shortly after I bought the stock. So better late than never.
No matter what, I am going to suffer through either and or both, dilution and traders buying and selling for fractional gains if gains happen, or watch the price head to 001. Remember my prediction was .004 for tomorrow.
However, I just saw .0067 so I'm not so sure I'll be right about tomorrow's price.
If DKAM can't keep revs growing, they're toast anyway. If they can, Rheingold might be their golden ring.
kezzek Share Thursday, February 03, 2011 1:18:24 PM
Re: FUNMAN818 post# 56191 Post # of 56200
Good luck Funman. I would argue that they did a great job with Trump from a sales and margin standpoint. They fell apart in not containing expenses then and I think now it's just not possible given the lack of funds, the liabilities and the equity.
None of that says the stock price can't or won't climb, but if it does, I think it will be entirely on hype and momentum.
Remember, the entire premise of the Mexcor deal was "We don't have the funds to pay for production, marketing, sales, etc." Immediately replacing that high margin, capital intensive spirits production with a low margin, capital intensive beer production does not bode well, IMHO.
But seriously, I hope you and the company do well.
Spartak Share Thursday, February 03, 2011 2:06:55 PM
Re: FUNMAN818 post# 56191 Post # of 56200
Hey, Funman, I wish you (unlike 2-3 'naked pumpers' here) success with your investment. Trust me I know how frustrating it is to be DKAM shareholder. But, for your sake, take my advise: don't deceive yourself in wheighing in only positive developments in your analysis. Decipher everything: positives and negatives. And while hoping for the best scenario, keep in mind worst one also.
If you ask me, DA's negatives outweigh positives by a mile. There will be more dilution, more R/S, more abandoned projects because of "market conditions" and as a result more chances to pick up those "cheapies".
AI
