Dear nodummy,
I won't paint a rosy picture of anything. SLMU has its work cut out in executing its plan, there is no doubt. In stating the truth about the past, we have a chance to make the present better. Accepting our roles in past pain with humility is a much better way to go, than simply recounting anyone's past without being transparent about who you are or your own agenda. And don't get me wrong, I think you have a role to play here in the name of transparency to help SLMU investors, if you wish to have one. I just wonder if you're doing what you're doing to truly help investors of SLMU, or for other reasons. If its just to help SLMU investors know the past truth, then good for you and I applaud you. If its not, then ask yourself how using this forum to get even is how to be.
Mike knows I am watching like a hawk to ensure that SLMU under-promises and over-delivers. Anyone who owns Apple (AAPL) stock for a while can see the benefits of taking that route. We have major corporations aligned now with us, and they have much more to lose than SLMU if the ventures fail. So the onus is indeed on the operating team to deliver the goods, and for Mike to steer the ship quite differently from the past. As for having to leave ICP Solar, I didn't do so with a happy heart as I founded that company. Yet I learned many lessons about life and business that will hopefully be useful to the stakeholders at SLMU.
Off for the weekend...will surely see you here soon.
Sass
AI
